Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Indeed. Everyone should be alarmed by the statistics this cycle, unprecedented. Coyotl Nov 2016 #1
Coyotl - thank you cilla4progress Nov 2016 #8
You're welcome. Coyotl Nov 2016 #14
So what do you account for the results? cilla4progress Nov 2016 #15
The possibility of election fraud cannot be ruled out on the evidence we have. Coyotl Nov 2016 #16
But what kind of fraud? cilla4progress Nov 2016 #17
But the third chart is labeled as "popular vote margins" not electoral college margins, and spooky3 Nov 2016 #19
The third chart is what it's labeled, and reflects Trump lost the popular vote Coyotl Nov 2016 #22
Kick Cracklin Charlie Nov 2016 #2
Agreed. The larger issue here too is that we dang well better start Kashkakat v.2.0 Nov 2016 #3
I agree cilla4progress Nov 2016 #18
K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2016 #4
I hope they're right. LisaM Nov 2016 #5
it a historic opportunity that cannot be passed up. mopinko Nov 2016 #6
I agree!!! I read the tweeters that started the whole thing/investigation. Saw when they reached Madam45for2923 Nov 2016 #7
kick Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #9
I think most everyone supports the recount BainsBane Nov 2016 #10
1000, this redeems Jill Stein a dozen times over paulkienitz Nov 2016 #11
K&R bdamomma Nov 2016 #12
good. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #13
k&r--I donated for the reasons you cited. And the article is very good. spooky3 Nov 2016 #20
Excellent information flamingdem Nov 2016 #21
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Recount started by Academ...»Reply #10