Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
8. Third Way Dems new war on Elizabeth Warren progressives: Why their centrist pitch is a political lo
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 11:49 AM
Dec 2016
Third Way Dems’ new war on Elizabeth Warren progressives: Why their centrist pitch is a political loser

JIM NEWELL - TUESDAY, AUG 11, 2015 08:00 AM EDT

The New Democrats want to spread their message of fulfilling big business's wish list. That'll sell!

~Snip~

The floor’s all yours, New Democrats. What policy ideas would sharpen House Democrats’ appeal to moderate voters?

• Trade deals. “When Obama needed support from his own party to pass landmark trade legislation, he turned to the New Democrat Coalition. The group mustered just enough votes — 28 in total — to clear fast-track trade authority through Congress, despite opposition from the party’s left, including Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California.“

• Dynamic scoring. “Reps. John Delaney of Maryland and Scott Peters of California introduced a ‘dynamic scoring’ bill — an issue normally favored by Republicans — that would encourage budget scorekeepers to score tax cuts favorably to reevaluate how Congress spends money on infrastructure, research and education.”

• “Reforming” Dodd-Frank. “Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes is one of the most outspoken advocates for reforming the Dodd-Frank financial regulations bill.” [Jim Himes seems like a nice fellow and has a good-by-congressmen-standards Twitter account. He is also owned by the banks.]

• Corporate tax reform. “Lawmakers in the coalition repeatedly stressed that reevaluating how the U.S. taxes corporate profits from overseas operations could be an area of compromise between the moderate Democrats and Republicans.”

OK OK, I think I see the problem here. This article and the quotes within it frame New Democrats’ proposal as geared toward appealing to voters. You know, voters! Humans who visit polling stations and cast their ballots for either Democratic or Republican candidates....


Read more:
http://www.salon.com/2015/08/11/third_way_dems_new_war_on_elizabeth_warren_progressives_why_their_centrist_pitch_is_a_political_loser/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I've been called each and every single one of those and my fealty questioned by those who wish to boston bean Dec 2016 #1
Most of them hang out at this site nowadays: think Dec 2016 #2
Looks like an obscure think tank. But I'm not sure why everyone keeps attacking them. DanTex Dec 2016 #4
Third Way Dems new war on Elizabeth Warren progressives: Why their centrist pitch is a political lo think Dec 2016 #8
"...the partys left, including Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California." DanTex Dec 2016 #13
The part you're quoting is an excerpt from Politico that the author was countering think Dec 2016 #16
It's a simple mathematical fact that the New Democrats are a small coalition. DanTex Dec 2016 #19
Supports TPP, cuts to Soc. Security & Medicare, tax breaks for corporations, "reforming" Dodd-Frank think Dec 2016 #20
With the exception of TPP, very few Dems agree with those things. DanTex Dec 2016 #21
Hey "Think" do you think I am one of them? CajunBlazer Dec 2016 #6
No. think Dec 2016 #9
Keep fighting the good fight? guillaumeb Dec 2016 #3
The good fight is the one against the GOP. DanTex Dec 2016 #5
The DLC does not exist as a formal organization, guillaumeb Dec 2016 #10
True. The DLC no longer exists. It's formal organization ended February 7, 2011 think Dec 2016 #12
Well, that's where you lose me. DanTex Dec 2016 #15
I think that people sometimes use the acronym "DLC" guillaumeb Dec 2016 #30
The problem is, it carries the implication that anyone DanTex Dec 2016 #31
Agreed. The use of any labels as shorthand risks oversimplifying. guillaumeb Dec 2016 #33
gotto distinguish yourself on the financing issues if you want to hang the GOP with them. JCanete Dec 2016 #7
That's pretty funny - i mean combining all those notions into one and pretending it's a confused el_bryanto Dec 2016 #11
Thirdway policies, hmm. DanTex Dec 2016 #14
There's always more solidarity when you aren't in charge. Common enemy and all. JCanete Dec 2016 #17
How would you suggest we determine what 3rd way means? DanTex Dec 2016 #22
But the point is you brought everything you know about Sarandon to the table, versus the two JCanete Dec 2016 #23
Ok, yes it's skewed. DanTex Dec 2016 #24
. NCTraveler Dec 2016 #18
It's essentially bullshit term (s) ismnotwasm Dec 2016 #25
After 12 years of Corrupt Trump/Pence... yallerdawg Dec 2016 #26
Thank you. I have been labeled one of those. leftofcool Dec 2016 #27
I agree Gothmog Dec 2016 #28
The magic words! betsuni Dec 2016 #29
Pure gobbledegook Bobbie Jo Dec 2016 #32
lol. good one. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #34
Funny thing: the people crying most about the DLC et. al. actualy helped actual fascists win. baldguy Dec 2016 #35
Hahahaha!!! AgadorSparticus Dec 2016 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Shout out to the neoliber...»Reply #8