Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

radius777

(3,836 posts)
20. I see nothing in that Snopes article which refutes anything.
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 01:31 AM
Dec 2016

In many ways, Snopes is just another MSM false equivalency website, of the type that gave us Trump.

Here is another recent Snopes article by that same author:

http://www.snopes.com/harry-david-says-company-neutral-racism-neo-nazis/
Brute Basket
Social media users claimed that representatives told them the company has no opinion about racism, but the company says otherwise.
Kim LaCapria
Dec 07, 2016
Claim: The company Harry & David had no concerns about advertising with Breitbart, saying they were "neutral" on issues of racism and anti-Semitism.
...
The Twitter account only seemed to have been activated after the 8 November 2016 election, and the account's tweets primarily engaged with companies its operator accused of placing ads with the media outlet Breitbart. The account's user appeared to take the view that Breitbart is a hub of neo-Nazism and racism. However, while Breitbart is an openly politically conservative web site, classification of it as definitively anti-Semitic or racist is subjective. In a November 2016 Los Angeles Times profile, company executives firmly rejected that characterization, saying that several senior-level employees (as well as the late Andrew Breitbart, its founder) are Jewish:
...


Anyone with half a brain knows that Breitbart has become an alt-right/white nationalist hub, even though it may not have started out that way.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Michigan, down the drain. elleng Dec 2016 #1
I didn't think it possible with paper ballots. longship Dec 2016 #2
who's going to do anything about it? seriously. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #4
Said Hitler before annexing the Sudentenland. byronius Dec 2016 #5
nothing to see here folks, move along... nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #3
Every country in the world who has been subjected to the arthritisR_US Dec 2016 #6
If the results can't be verified... DFW Dec 2016 #7
There is no such thing as a do-over, its unconstitutional Grey Lemercier Dec 2016 #21
The voting doesn't matter, the people who count the votes matter....... UCmeNdc Dec 2016 #8
Blaming this on a conspiracy between state and local election officials is ridiculous MichMan Dec 2016 #9
Denial mixed with confirmation bias can give some whacky results FBaggins Dec 2016 #10
Can we get this from a reliable news source? Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2016 #11
Refute one thing he has written flamingdem Dec 2016 #14
Well, there's this gem that snopes debunked. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2016 #15
I see nothing in that Snopes article which refutes anything. radius777 Dec 2016 #20
Snopes is more accurate than Palmer could ever hope to be. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2016 #24
Would several be ok? FBaggins Dec 2016 #25
Should still be able to count the actual ballots. They know why the machine counts were off, jmg257 Dec 2016 #12
2000 Deja Vu colsohlibgal Dec 2016 #13
A MI recount would be good but neither party wants it now ChetSinger Dec 2016 #16
Post a link about ballot box stuffing in Michigan please flamingdem Dec 2016 #18
Sure, here: ChetSinger Dec 2016 #19
US elections can never be won as long as we have these states running the game BSdetect Dec 2016 #17
Welcome to the US Constitution Grey Lemercier Dec 2016 #22
You need to add poor and even middle class to your flamingdem Dec 2016 #26
The Democratic Party is losing because of weak state government control UCmeNdc Dec 2016 #23
Yes and control means flamingdem Dec 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Michigan recount has expo...»Reply #20