Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boston bean

(36,661 posts)
14. That is wrong. It didn't count and actual vote for a person. It counted how many time it was
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 07:04 AM
Dec 2016

Attempted to be run through the machine. That is why log books didn't match mumber of physical ballots.

And is now the reasons being used to not recount certain precincts.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Every blue constitutional lawyer out there should be lending their expertise to Steins team Nwgirl503 Dec 2016 #1
+1 uponit7771 Dec 2016 #4
+2 iluvtennis Dec 2016 #8
The fact that they aren't is telling about the validity of Stein's claims mythology Dec 2016 #9
I would hope there has been at least some attempt Nwgirl503 Dec 2016 #10
By that logic, I assume you must be fine with the Benghazi investigation, with mythology Dec 2016 #15
Yes. Trying to ensure the integrity of an election is exactly the same Crunchy Frog Dec 2016 #17
Something got lost here Nwgirl503 Dec 2016 #18
There is a new crop of donate buttons online from this election, same old people as always Coyotl Dec 2016 #19
the top 1% class of this country heaven05 Dec 2016 #2
Can "Constitutional Lawyer" get a refund on his education? He deserves one. FBaggins Dec 2016 #3
I wonder why Clinton didn't request the recounts. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2016 #16
The recount was starting to overturn stones and people could see the ugly truth UCmeNdc Dec 2016 #5
And the state would end up going to Hillary with those 70,000 uncounted votes in Detroit... iluvtennis Dec 2016 #6
Those breakdowns helped Hillary, not Trump ChetSinger Dec 2016 #11
That depends on who resets the counters when, doesn't it? ucrdem Dec 2016 #13
That is wrong. It didn't count and actual vote for a person. It counted how many time it was boston bean Dec 2016 #14
Judge: "vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack" Coyotl Dec 2016 #7
it's treason, that's what it is. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #12
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It's an "Outrage" That Ju...»Reply #14