Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
19. There is a new crop of donate buttons online from this election, same old people as always
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 10:35 AM
Dec 2016

who make their living with web donate buttons and book selling. But not every one of them is a con artist, some are dedicated election integrity activists.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Every blue constitutional lawyer out there should be lending their expertise to Steins team Nwgirl503 Dec 2016 #1
+1 uponit7771 Dec 2016 #4
+2 iluvtennis Dec 2016 #8
The fact that they aren't is telling about the validity of Stein's claims mythology Dec 2016 #9
I would hope there has been at least some attempt Nwgirl503 Dec 2016 #10
By that logic, I assume you must be fine with the Benghazi investigation, with mythology Dec 2016 #15
Yes. Trying to ensure the integrity of an election is exactly the same Crunchy Frog Dec 2016 #17
Something got lost here Nwgirl503 Dec 2016 #18
There is a new crop of donate buttons online from this election, same old people as always Coyotl Dec 2016 #19
the top 1% class of this country heaven05 Dec 2016 #2
Can "Constitutional Lawyer" get a refund on his education? He deserves one. FBaggins Dec 2016 #3
I wonder why Clinton didn't request the recounts. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2016 #16
The recount was starting to overturn stones and people could see the ugly truth UCmeNdc Dec 2016 #5
And the state would end up going to Hillary with those 70,000 uncounted votes in Detroit... iluvtennis Dec 2016 #6
Those breakdowns helped Hillary, not Trump ChetSinger Dec 2016 #11
That depends on who resets the counters when, doesn't it? ucrdem Dec 2016 #13
That is wrong. It didn't count and actual vote for a person. It counted how many time it was boston bean Dec 2016 #14
Judge: "vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack" Coyotl Dec 2016 #7
it's treason, that's what it is. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #12
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It's an "Outrage" That Ju...»Reply #19