Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)

6. Dems definitely need to continue competing in PA, OH, MI, WI and MN.

Reply to uponit7771 (Reply #5)

Thu Dec 22, 2016, 05:53 PM

Dec 2016

If they don't, then turning Texas blue won't matter. They'll also need FL, NC, VA, CO, AZ and GA to become reliably blue if they give up on PA, OH, MI, etc.

Iowa is a state Dems should spend fewer resources on.

If the DNC is smart, it will immediately invest in engaging potential voters in Texas, Arizona and Georgia. Those three states, consisting of 65 electoral votes, are ripe for the picking. Town halls and canvassing don't have to wait for an election. Those things should be done between election cycles. Find the 40% who don't take part in presidential elections and the 60% who don't take part in mid-term elections. Inform and motivate them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The surest way to get rid of the electoral college. [View all] Garrett78 Dec 2016 OP

Or generate a scenario where a Dem wins the EC vote but a Repub wins the popular vote. LonePirate Dec 2016 #1

That could do the trick, but Texas going blue would present a long-term problem. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #2

Very true. Plus a blue TX pretty much guarantees a blue AZ, FL, GA and NC as well. LonePirate Dec 2016 #3

PA was one DNC main stay... it'll be a fight but well worth it IMHO... there's enough exurban libera uponit7771 Dec 2016 #5

Dems definitely need to continue competing in PA, OH, MI, WI and MN. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #6

Not Ohio. This election proved Ohio is gone for good. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #19

I'm not ready to dismiss Ohio. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #21

I don't think Ohio is gone either... Yurovsky Dec 2016 #27

Obama won Houston by 1960 TOTAL votes... Clinton won that area by 167,000!! Turn Texas BLUE DAMMIT ! uponit7771 Dec 2016 #4

it won't turn blue without investment at the state and local levels pstokely Dec 2016 #18

Investment is key. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #20

If Texas is so close to being blue TexasProgresive Dec 2016 #7

I don't know how close it is to becoming blue but the demographics suggest it can happen. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #8

I wonder how Liz would do there. Crunchy Frog Dec 2016 #10

aren't there lots of Yankee transplants in TX? pstokely Dec 2016 #12

because statewide elections in TX are help during midterm years pstokely Dec 2016 #11

That would, indeed, make a big difference. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #13

+1, ... and midterms are gerrymandered and voter suppressed nationwide too uponit7771 Dec 2016 #14

All that we'd need is to win a majority of EC votes, with a minority of popular votes. Crunchy Frog Dec 2016 #9

Only until the South accepts civil rights for everyone will some of it turn blue again mtnsnake Dec 2016 #15

is VA not part of the South? pstokely Dec 2016 #16

No, it's part of Toronto mtnsnake Dec 2016 #17

VA turned blue because of minorities and people moving from blue states JI7 Dec 2016 #22

I think the potential is there for TX, GA and NC to become reliably blue. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #25

People from Texas need to pipe in here marlakay Dec 2016 #23

tRump only won it by 9%, Mittens did won it by a bigger margin in 2012 pstokely Dec 2016 #24

Northern Texas Wichita Falls marlakay Dec 2016 #30

The first reply was... Mike Nelson Dec 2016 #26

The Lege and Gov would just split its EC votes. n/t Orsino Dec 2016 #28

Not going to happen... Rage4Bacon Dec 2016 #29

I'm not advocating for a campaign to get rid of the EC. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #31