Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
18. Suggested reading:
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 07:46 PM
Jan 2017
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/01/bernie-sanders-reparations/424602/

The spectacle of a socialist candidate opposing reparations as “divisive” (there are few political labels more divisive in the minds of Americans than socialist) is only rivaled by the implausibility of Sanders posing as a pragmatist.


Sometimes the moral course lies within the politically possible, and sometimes the moral course lies outside of the politically possible. One of the great functions of radical candidates is to war against equivocators and opportunists who conflate these two things. Radicals expand the political imagination and, hopefully, prevent incrementalism from becoming a virtue.

Unfortunately, Sanders’s radicalism has failed in the ancient fight against white supremacy.


This is the “class first” approach, originating in the myth that racism and socialism are necessarily incompatible. But raising the minimum wage doesn’t really address the fact that black men without criminal records have about the same shot at low-wage work as white men with them; nor can making college free address the wage gap between black and white graduates. Housing discrimination, historical and present, may well be the fulcrum of white supremacy. Affirmative action is one of the most disputed issues of the day. Neither are addressed in the “racial justice” section of Sanders platform.

Sanders’s anti-racist moderation points to a candidate who is not merely against reparations, but one who doesn’t actually understand the argument. To briefly restate it, from 1619 until at least the late 1960s, American institutions, businesses, associations, and governments—federal, state, and local—repeatedly plundered black communities. Their methods included everything from land-theft, to red-lining, to disenfranchisement, to convict-lease labor, to lynching, to enslavement, to the vending of children. So large was this plunder that America, as we know it today, is simply unimaginable without it. Its great universities were founded on it. Its early economy was built by it. Its suburbs were financed by it. Its deadliest war was the result of it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Candidates who focus on those issues probably won't survive the primaries. Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #1
Can we please move PAST talking about this in Hillary v. Bernie terms? Ken Burch Jan 2017 #2
I prefer to look at the past to help predict the future. Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #3
The answer is to about race AND class...not to just not mention class. Ken Burch Jan 2017 #4
An excellent critique. guillaumeb Jan 2017 #5
Thank you. I'm trying to get us past the primary thing Ken Burch Jan 2017 #6
At this point they are distractions. guillaumeb Jan 2017 #7
We can address both things. Ken Burch Jan 2017 #8
I like the Democracy Summer label. guillaumeb Jan 2017 #9
For Texas, it could be about channeling support to in-state groups. Ken Burch Jan 2017 #10
It's relative. Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #11
Perhaps. Although we had one in '84 and '88 & the party brass did all it could to stop him. Ken Burch Jan 2017 #13
He scared away too many white voters. Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #15
Neither Clinton nor Kerry were front runners dsc Jan 2017 #16
Suggested reading: Garrett78 Jan 2017 #18
I understand the argument on moral grounds, but I just don't think it will work. Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #19
You could build popular support for reparations Ken Burch Jan 2017 #22
If that can be done, then good! Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #23
Look, I support reparations and think Bernie COULD have said more about race Ken Burch Jan 2017 #21
Exactly what most of us have been doing. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #12
I supported her in the fall, and I've proved I was never a Hillary-hater. Ken Burch Jan 2017 #14
My post had zero to do with Bernie or who you supported and when. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #17
It was that line about sounding like a Clinton supporter and hearing her stump speech. Ken Burch Jan 2017 #20
My post had nothing to do with who you supported or when. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #24
Ok. Ken Burch Jan 2017 #25
Agree strongly. n/t delisen Jan 2017 #26
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We can fight vote suppres...»Reply #18