Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: My head is spinning [View all]Gothmog
(157,832 posts)67. Anti-Defamation League Releases Statement on Disturbing and Disqualifying Remarks from Keith Ellis
It is not just Alan Dershowitz. The ADL has issued a statement on Ellison that will carry a great deal of weight with American Jews http://www.mediaite.com/online/anti-defamation-league-releases-statement-on-disturbing-and-disqualifying-remarks-from-ellison/
When Rep. Ellisons candidacy to be chair of the Democratic National Committee was first reported, ADL did not rush to judgment. Instead, we took a hard look at the totality of his record on key issues on our agenda. We spoke to numerous leaders in the community and to Mr. Ellison himself. ADLs subsequent statement on his candidacy appreciated his contrition on some matters, acknowledged areas of commonality but clearly expressed real concern where Rep. Ellison held divergent policy views, particularly related to Israels security.
New information recently has come to light that raises serious concerns about whether Rep. Ellison faithfully could represent the Democratic Partys traditional support for a strong and secure Israel. In a speech recorded in 2010 to a group of supporters, Rep. Ellison is heard suggesting that American foreign policy in the Middle East is driven by Israel, saying: The United States foreign policy in the Middle East is governed by what is good or bad through a country of 7 million people. A region of 350 million all turns on a country of 7 million. Does that make sense? Is that logic? Right? When the Americans who trace their roots back to those 350 million get involved, everything changes.
Rep. Ellisons remarks are both deeply disturbing and disqualifying. His words imply that U.S. foreign policy is based on religiously or national origin-based special interests rather than simply on Americas best interests. Additionally, whether intentional or not, his words raise the specter of age-old stereotypes about Jewish control of our government, a poisonous myth that may persist in parts of the world where intolerance thrives, but that has no place in open societies like the U.S. These comments sharply contrast with the Democratic National Committee platform position, which states: A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism.
ADL is a non-partisan organization and does not support any political party; however, we deeply believe in the importance of bipartisan support for Israel. Such support is crucial to ensure continued engagement with our most important ally in the region, a democracy whose emphasis on equality and commitment to the rule of law stands in stark contrast to the anarchy and authoritarian regimes that prevail in much of the Middle East. These shared values are the bedrock for the long-standing relationship between the U.S. and Israel.
Whoever it may be, we would hope that the next head of the Democratic Party would have fidelity to these timeless ideals at all times.
New information recently has come to light that raises serious concerns about whether Rep. Ellison faithfully could represent the Democratic Partys traditional support for a strong and secure Israel. In a speech recorded in 2010 to a group of supporters, Rep. Ellison is heard suggesting that American foreign policy in the Middle East is driven by Israel, saying: The United States foreign policy in the Middle East is governed by what is good or bad through a country of 7 million people. A region of 350 million all turns on a country of 7 million. Does that make sense? Is that logic? Right? When the Americans who trace their roots back to those 350 million get involved, everything changes.
Rep. Ellisons remarks are both deeply disturbing and disqualifying. His words imply that U.S. foreign policy is based on religiously or national origin-based special interests rather than simply on Americas best interests. Additionally, whether intentional or not, his words raise the specter of age-old stereotypes about Jewish control of our government, a poisonous myth that may persist in parts of the world where intolerance thrives, but that has no place in open societies like the U.S. These comments sharply contrast with the Democratic National Committee platform position, which states: A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States because we share overarching strategic interests and the common values of democracy, equality, tolerance, and pluralism.
ADL is a non-partisan organization and does not support any political party; however, we deeply believe in the importance of bipartisan support for Israel. Such support is crucial to ensure continued engagement with our most important ally in the region, a democracy whose emphasis on equality and commitment to the rule of law stands in stark contrast to the anarchy and authoritarian regimes that prevail in much of the Middle East. These shared values are the bedrock for the long-standing relationship between the U.S. and Israel.
Whoever it may be, we would hope that the next head of the Democratic Party would have fidelity to these timeless ideals at all times.
I am Jewish voter and the ADL's concerns carry a great deal of weight . I have seen Ellison's letter back to the ADL and I am not impressed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
He's been taking aim at the Democratic Party for 40 years, but never on a national level.
George II
Jan 2017
#32
I don't think anyone said or even thinks he is the official voice of Jews....
George II
Jan 2017
#33
I would like to win over supporters but Bernie sends a message to them when he does not join
Demsrule86
Jan 2017
#53
And sadly many Americans will too - Ellison would be a dividing force in the party AND....
George II
Jan 2017
#34
So you want Jewish Voters to be alienated from the party to help the Sanders wing?
Gothmog
Jan 2017
#62
Just because you disagree with the facts does not mean that the facts are not true
Gothmog
Jan 2017
#65
Anti-Defamation League Releases Statement on Disturbing and Disqualifying Remarks from Keith Ellis
Gothmog
Jan 2017
#67
You may disagree with the ADL but that does not change the facts relied on by the ADL
Gothmog
Jan 2017
#100
Keith is not Bernie?! Had me fooled... notice, you never see 'em in the same room together?!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jan 2017
#78
So let's just keep catering to big corporate donors instead of being a populist party that can win?
RBInMaine
Jan 2017
#37
"It's been proven that Bernie did all he could in the fall to help Hillary."
George II
Jan 2017
#103
There really is no comparison between how the two candidates acted before and during....
George II
Jan 2017
#105
Between the 2 major parties, the only one that even remotely promotes populism is the Dem. Party.
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#50
Ding ding ding!! We hava winna!! You absolutely nailed it RB!! (Great minds think alike! haha!)
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jan 2017
#79
All there was was a thread where people said they didn't care if Alan Dershowitz left the party.
Ken Burch
Jan 2017
#20
I mentioned Bernie because your main reason for opposing Keith Ellison(the name thing was a typo)...
Ken Burch
Jan 2017
#23
Bernie's not going to run for the presidency again, so his party status, at this point, is moot.
Ken Burch
Jan 2017
#51
I love Elizabeth Warren and will probably support her in 2020 but I disagree that the fake scandal
StevieM
Jan 2017
#57
What in Keith Ellison's resume' make him the most qualified to do the job of DNC chair?
still_one
Jan 2017
#35
Harry Reid blasts "worthless" DNC in blistering critique of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2017
#72
So your point is that I shouldn't have criticized DWS in July for giving that stupid Times interview
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2017
#83
And here's Harry Reid, confirming what we all knew- namely that she did a phenomenally shitty job.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2017
#85