Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
11. "He also claims we are using Red Scare tactics."
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 10:23 AM
Jan 2017

That should have cleared it up. It's clear who said it.

"is now speaking for feminists"

Also in the article by ratfucker Goodman in case the first reference wasn't enough for some.

Now I have included his name in the op, before your reply here, for those who weren't able to make the connections above. It's clear why Goodman worked on some.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

HA Goodman is a joke Gothmog Jan 2017 #1
I assume you are referring to H A Goodman, who is indeed an ass The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2017 #2
Olbermann isn't the one claiming we are using Red Scare tactics. The author of that piece is. kcr Jan 2017 #3
I thought it was pretty clear I was talking about the author of the piece. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #4
Actually, that wasn't clear at all. You might want to edit your headline n/t kcr Jan 2017 #6
I truly don't see how. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #7
Not everyone is a fan of Olbermann. Sorry for the misunderstanding. kcr Jan 2017 #8
Understood. I actually referenced multiple items in the Goodman article. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #10
Not, it's not ... not even close n/t SFnomad Jan 2017 #9
"He also claims we are using Red Scare tactics." NCTraveler Jan 2017 #11
No, it didn't "clear it up" SFnomad Jan 2017 #16
Didn't think I needed his name with the clear references. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #17
I was writing my reply before you put his name in the title SFnomad Jan 2017 #18
I don't know what ppl are going on about. You'd have to have serious reading comprehension problems dionysus Jan 2017 #34
Correct, HA Goodman is an right wing hack posing as a leftier than thou. Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #5
We're seeing the reverse of the Trots into neocons in 2017. forjusticethunders Jan 2017 #12
Yup. nt Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2017 #14
Correct. boston bean Jan 2017 #33
"red scare tactics" .... JHan Jan 2017 #13
Exactly. Ace Rothstein Jan 2017 #27
He Owes An Apology To HRC Me. Jan 2017 #15
Neither is... otohara Jan 2017 #19
Thank you for this addition. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #20
Fascism is as fascism does. BainsBane Jan 2017 #22
K&R as well! BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #24
this "everybody critical of Hillary is in league with Russia" stuff is batshit insane. nt m-lekktor Jan 2017 #25
au contraire otohara Jan 2017 #28
And where did you read in the OP the statement saying charlyvi Jan 2017 #30
Anyone who did not vote for Hillary helped elect the Siberian candidate Demsrule86 Jan 2017 #37
One of the best things i've read in a long time: JHan Jan 2017 #26
History doesn't repeat itself...but it rhymes. forjusticethunders Jan 2017 #40
Russian propagandist BainsBane Jan 2017 #21
K&R! BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #23
Sad that so many on DU fell for HAHA Goodman's war against Hillary Clinton as he pretended to be BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #29
You'd have to be pretty stupid to think that a Rand Paul endorser pnwmom Jan 2017 #31
I'd noticed! And they did so with the anger and aggression you'd expect a Republican to defend BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #32
Bernie was the weaker candidate which is why they wanted him. Demsrule86 Jan 2017 #38
The best part of HaHa Goodman... Adrahil Jan 2017 #35
That guy is strictly anti-Hillary! Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #36
Goodman has been batshit insane fow awhile.... Blue_Tires Jan 2017 #39
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»HA Goodman is not a progr...»Reply #11