Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
2. I think the equivalence is more like being forced into treatment for TB or
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 12:24 PM
Mar 2013

an STD. Historically both have been done in various places around the US in the interest of public health and safety.

Getting jailed generally requires a willful violation of the law. I don't thing anyone working in a mental health field would see acquiring a mental illness as a willful act. I'm not sure if committing a crime to access prison healthcare is actually a common practice.

An ethical issue is whether every person has a right to refuse psychological treatment.

Pubic fear of the mentally ill is quite elevated after the Tucson, Aurora CO, and Newtown killings and sentiment is running high for government to provide protection from persons with mental illness.

It's generally accepted that a person with a mental ill has the right to refuse "shock" treatments, be it electro-shock, insulin-shock etc, as well refusal of hallucinogens or and other psychoactive drugs.

Should a state be able to mandate any of those extreme treatments as well?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Mental Health Information»LA backs Cal. laws to man...»Reply #2