Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
3. I'm just as curious about the scoring of the self-reported relief of symptoms...
Sun Nov 30, 2014, 06:45 PM
Nov 2014

A finding of no difference is usually not considered particularly meaningful, unless something significantly cheaper (or more free of downside risk) is just as good as something significantly more expensive (or has more downside risk).

Without accessing the primary publication it's not possible to be be sure that the components that go into the self-reports are actually comparable. For example group therapy by itself results in interpersonal interactions that could be scored as spending more time concerned about others...sometimes that is a performance objective of depression therapy. One-on-one therapy doesn't generate that interaction directly. The differences in experience within the group session might be conflated with outcomes beyond the clinic and from the brief report it's a question that is unaddressed.

But, the investigators reportedly interpret the result as a rationale for replacing one-on-one CBT by a therapist (probably expensive) with group mindfulness sessions run by 'certified instructors' (probably less expensive).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Mental Health Information»Lipstick on a pig? Mindf...»Reply #3