Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
17. Agreed. Should HRC's candidacy never materialize, or stumble/self-destruct
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 08:10 AM
Apr 2015

before the primary, it's important to get the word out far and wide about what a powerful and personable candidate Elizabeth Warren would be. In addition to the myriad potential bombshells of all those emails HRC attempted to deep-six, but which may be produced at any time by the senders, receivers or hackers of same, there's the whole issue of HRC's health history, both the known episodes and the unknown. Warren is dynamic and energetic and looks to be in good physical condition. HRC? None of the above. This is not about physical attractiveness; it's about health history, physical fitness and personal energy level and being able to handle the demands of the campaign trail and the Oval Office.

I'm close in age to both women, have MANY female friends in that age bracket, and many of us have to struggle to keep our weight under control (Damn you, Cadbury Easter eggs!) That would be a lot easier if I could afford a personal dietician, a physical fitness coach and the latest high tech exercise equipment. HRC has the financial resources to avail herself of every possible method to maintain a healthy weight. So why is she an unhealthy, obese, size 18? Obesity is an abnormal accumulation of body fat, usually 20% or more over an individual's ideal body weight. HRC is at least 50% over her ideal weight. Obesity, as we all know, is associated with decreased energy levels and increased risk of illness, disability, and death.

When she left the SOS office and pretty much disappeared from public view for months, I expected her to make a gargantuan effort to get herself back in a healthy physical shape in preparation for a campaign. She'd watched Bill lose a significant amount of weight, and should know what is required to do so. One explanation is that she may be on some medication which results in weight gain. Prescription drugs used for mood disorders, diabetes, high blood pressure and seizures, among others, can have that effect.

Bottom line: any candidate's health is a legitimate concern, and weight is a major factor thereof.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Excuse me, but has any other newspaper called for Warren to run? Jefferson23 Apr 2015 #1
I don't know. I live in Boston. merrily Apr 2015 #2
I think this is a first, but could be wrong. The entire editorial board, very interesting Jefferson23 Apr 2015 #3
My pleasure. I thought this group would enjoy it. merrily Apr 2015 #4
um ellennelle Apr 2015 #5
Thanks..I did not check the date of the OP. n/t Jefferson23 Apr 2015 #6
Don't worry about the date of the article. Warren has said many times she is not running. merrily Apr 2015 #11
No worries, I hear what you're saying. I should have checked the date though..as the Jefferson23 Apr 2015 #27
Thanks for snarky condescension. However, this is not LBN and she's been saying she will not run merrily Apr 2015 #7
"I simply posted something positive about Warren in the Warren group." RiverLover Apr 2015 #8
You're more than welcome RiverLover. merrily Apr 2015 #10
Ummm backatcha! Don't be such a Debbie Downer! Divernan Apr 2015 #9
Cognitive dissonance. Her first post in the Warren forum is to lash out at me for posting merrily Apr 2015 #13
"but she has put the kibosh on it." So before their endorsement she said she would run? RiverLover Apr 2015 #12
Agreed. Should HRC's candidacy never materialize, or stumble/self-destruct Divernan Apr 2015 #17
You might enjoy this ... Scuba Apr 2015 #16
She is in my opinion the Democrat most likely to win. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #28
The Boston Herald is no competitor. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2015 #14
The Globe's wiki calls the Herald the Globe's chief competitor. I agree. merrily Apr 2015 #15
The NYT no longer owns The Boston Globe Fla Dem Apr 2015 #18
Thanks. merrily Apr 2015 #20
No prob. Fla Dem Apr 2015 #26
The fact remains that nothing Warren says will make HRC more acceptable or palatable. To me. djean111 Apr 2015 #19
Do you have any thoughts about why they think it so important to kill any hope of a Warren candidacy merrily Apr 2015 #21
Part of it is, and all of this is IMO, sheer hubris. Which may have been the HRC is inevitable djean111 Apr 2015 #22
Good post - thanks. Re your SCOTUS Divernan Apr 2015 #23
Exactly. I believe Hillary would appoint a corporate Jamie Dimon-approved judge, djean111 Apr 2015 #25
I think you may well be right about O'Malley merrily Apr 2015 #24
Totally on board with your post. I will not give up on Warren. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Elizabeth Warren»Boston Globe's Editorial ...»Reply #17