Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Elizabeth Warren

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Autumn

(47,218 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 08:12 AM Apr 2015

"Hillary is playing progressives for fools: Why you shouldn’t believe her populist talk on trade" [View all]

Cross posted at the request of another DUer. Special thanks to RiverLover

"Hillary is playing progressives for fools: Why you shouldn’t believe her populist talk on trade"

Hillary is playing progressives for fools: Why you shouldn’t believe her populist talk on trade
SALON
4/21/15

Hillary Clinton is allegedly still making up her mind about TPP. Does anyone really believe this?

*** ...The goal is greater prosperity and security for American families, not trade for trade’s sake. She will be watching closely to see what is being done to crack down on currency manipulation, improve labor rights, protect the environment and health, promote transparency, and open new opportunities for our small businesses to export overseas. As she warned in her book, “Hard Choices,” we shouldn’t be giving special rights to corporations at the expense of workers and consumers,” Clinton’s spokesperson continued.***

Uh-huh. So, here’s a question: If Clinton does eventually come out against TPP, why would anyone in their right mind believe that? If candidate Clinton says that as president, she would either withdraw from or renegotiate TPP, how naive would you possibly have to be to believe that she would follow through with that?

You know all that stuff about labor and environmental protections that Clinton says she’s going to keep a close eye on? In 2012, she referred to TPP as the “gold standard” there.

In November 2012, the then-secretary of state declared that “we need to keep upping our game both bilaterally and with partners across the region through agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership or TPP. … This TPP sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade, the kind of environment that has the rule of law and a level playing field. And when negotiated, this agreement will cover 40 percent of the world’s total trade and build in strong protections for workers and the environment.”

Read more~
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/21/hillary_is_playing_progressives_for_fools_why_you_shouldnt_believe_her_populist_talk_on_trade/



43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Too bad Elizabeth Warren is not running, she would have been amazing! darkangel218 Apr 2015 #1
"build in strong protections for workers and the environment" LMFAO L0oniX Apr 2015 #2
Yeah, That's a big roll on the floor. Autumn Apr 2015 #3
they already believe she tried to make a "liberal IWR": a lefty TPP isn't beyond the capacity MisterP Apr 2015 #32
Such sarcasm and anger leveled Evergreen Emerald Apr 2015 #4
Do you have any comments on the Salon article? Autumn Apr 2015 #6
Yes Evergreen Emerald Apr 2015 #8
You know what? I have never seen anyone post that Hillary is evil or an evil liar Autumn Apr 2015 #11
Really? Then you are not looking Evergreen Emerald Apr 2015 #12
There are some posters that I just ignore. They aren't worth my time. Autumn Apr 2015 #15
Yep. Phlem Apr 2015 #22
There you go again. Evergreen Emerald Apr 2015 #39
"You act as if you know exactly what is in the trade deal" Phlem Apr 2015 #40
what? Evergreen Emerald Apr 2015 #42
What!? Phlem Apr 2015 #43
Why do these posts assume people are being 'fooled'? Most here acknowledge blm Apr 2015 #5
If you are comfortable with the way things are and the direction this country is going Autumn Apr 2015 #7
You're not comfortable answering a simple question? Who is being 'fooled'? blm Apr 2015 #10
I don't need to answer that question. It's a warning to progressives not to be Autumn Apr 2015 #14
And Dems who question YOUR claim do NOT realize blm Apr 2015 #16
I made no such claim. If you don't want to discuss the article then don't bother. Autumn Apr 2015 #17
I can support Warren and still not push the BS that progressive Dems are blm Apr 2015 #19
You know the purpose of this discussion board is to post articles and thing like that Autumn Apr 2015 #26
And so I asked, Who is being fooled? blm Apr 2015 #28
Why don't you write the author of the piece straighten them right up over their choice of words. Autumn Apr 2015 #30
And this one is about being fooled, or the word "fooled" Phlem Apr 2015 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Autumn Apr 2015 #25
No one thinks that, either. blm Apr 2015 #29
I don't need to, you can look for them. Now I'm done with your trolling of this group. Autumn Apr 2015 #31
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Capt. Obvious Apr 2015 #35
People have been blocked from groups for a lot less Autumn Apr 2015 #37
someone got upset. hobbit709 Apr 2015 #36
He/she posted in GD wanting to open another group to support Elizabeth Warren Autumn Apr 2015 #38
I think the poll numbers is what the author is referring to. LOTS of Dems being fooled. RiverLover Apr 2015 #9
No - I'm being realistic. I am not one who cares what people think of me personally. blm Apr 2015 #13
So you're a not a fool RiverLover Apr 2015 #18
All that instead of a simple answer. blm Apr 2015 #20
Fine. RiverLover Apr 2015 #21
ahem... and apparently we're not being realistic. Phlem Apr 2015 #41
Center Left? Phlem Apr 2015 #23
Do keep in mind this is a protected group for supporters of Elizabeth Warren. Autumn Apr 2015 #27
No worries Autumn. Phlem Apr 2015 #33
Yeah I should know that. I was busy with another poster who was trolling in here and responded Autumn Apr 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Elizabeth Warren»"Hillary is playing ...»Reply #0