General Discussion

Hellbound Hellhound

(246 posts)

19. Yes, yes, and you'd be wrong regarding peer-reviewed journals.

Sun Jan 19, 2025, 06:21 PM

Jan 19

Guess what. You pay your way in. Got money? You can get peer reviewed, and that was back in 2006.

I suggest you read your own article. Time and time again, the study insists that it's "inclusive of estimates based on a (completely unrelated conflict) to extrapolate data".

It's propaganda. It uses "self reporting" from Hamas-run social media with a 30% accuracy and methodologies from an unrelated conflict to extrapolate potential casualties and even then acknowledges a flatlining of civilian deaths up until they chose to end the study when it "Suddenly" jumps.

I'm honestly no fan of unnecessary suffering or casualties but I'm even less a fan of propaganda.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Researchers say Gaza death toll may be significantly higher than previously estimated [View all] iemanja Jan 19 OP

K & R malaise Jan 19 #1

I wonder how long it will take for the damage control brigade to start trying to derail this thread. Dave Bowman Jan 19 #6

Well you have shithole........... Lovie777 Jan 19 #9

already happened iemanja Jan 19 #10

To say nothing of the OP. Beastly Boy Sunday #39

And all this time there has been an outcry about how Klarkashton Jan 19 #2

Interesting, isn't it iemanja Jan 19 #4

much higher............ Lovie777 Jan 19 #3

Well, it will stop Bettie Jan 19 #23

Looks like Hamas is manipulating the numbers again. Hellbound Hellhound Jan 19 #5

This study says the numbers are far higher than Hamas estimates iemanja Jan 19 #7

Post removed Post removed Jan 19 #8

It's based on an academic study iemanja Jan 19 #11

The "Methodology" includes "An Online Survey" from Hamas. Hellbound Hellhound Jan 19 #12

It's published in a peer reviewed academic journal iemanja Jan 19 #13

Kick away. I'll even help. I welcome more people seeing our little "interaction" here. Hellbound Hellhound Jan 19 #15

Methodology iemanja Jan 19 #17

Yes, yes, and you'd be wrong regarding peer-reviewed journals. Hellbound Hellhound Jan 19 #19

"I'm even less a fan of propaganda." Dave Bowman Jan 19 #26

It's statistical analysis iemanja Jan 20 #32

Lancet does not pay reviewers iemanja Jan 20 #33

None of the authors are affiliated with Lancet. Beastly Boy Sunday #38

Stop it with all these facts, it might create discomfort and/or cognitive dissonance for a tiny minority of people. Dave Bowman Jan 19 #25

"Kick away. I'll even help" Dave Bowman Jan 19 #28

There could be many bodies still buried in the rubble in Gaza. IMO the death count will go up. brush Jan 19 #29

I agree, it will be horrific when they proceed to clear the rubbles. Dave Bowman Jan 19 #31

Thanks! iemanja Jan 21 #35

It was not. Beastly Boy Sunday #37

It was not an academic study. Beastly Boy Sunday #36

The title of that poster's erstwhile gotcha article: 'Why the Gaza Health Ministry's death count is considered reliable' Celerity Jan 19 #16

We're supposed to look at pictures of rubble and conclude no one was actually killed iemanja Jan 19 #18

Post removed Post removed Jan 19 #20

I dismiss your snarky, condescending personal attack: 'Forgive me for assuming competence.' Celerity Jan 19 #24

Yeah, how convenient. Dave Bowman Jan 19 #27

Make the look bad. enid602 Jan 19 #21

Considering this study includes "instagram" as a source, I think Hamas is making themselves look worse. Hellbound Hellhound Jan 19 #22

I follow both .......... Lovie777 Jan 19 #14

But remember, it's only genocide if it happens to Israelis. Sky Jewels Jan 19 #30

Kick iemanja Jan 20 #34