Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WAPO: GOP members sent rape threats to Cassidy Hutchinson after her testimony [View all]AZJonnie
(262 posts)74. We don't have any idea what was actually said though
Your argument is based on a hypothetical text. And in fact, we don't even know the texts happened in the context of her giving testimony. They could've been any at time, perhaps long before anyone could've known that she 'needed to be shut up' because she'd later testify against Trump If WaPo had stated that what you theorized was actually texted to her, during or soon after her testimony, then I doubt anyone here would downplay it. Although I think you'd see arguments made that she definitely should've reported it at the time, to the world, including from myself.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
WAPO: GOP members sent rape threats to Cassidy Hutchinson after her testimony [View all]
deminks
Jan 23
OP
Sexual texts that are unsolicited and graphic are sexual harassment and abusive.
58Sunliner
Jan 26
#77
I may have to copy this to an easy-to-find location, since this confusion seems to be widespread.
soldierant
Jan 23
#45
I am surprised by Josh Marshall; there is no mention of rape threats in the article. n/t
demmiblue
Jan 23
#6
Threatening to rape a witness may not always be covered by the debate clause
struggle4progress
Jan 23
#8
Bring it out. Just bring it. "We need to know who the predators are." Rec x 1000.
Evolve Dammit
Jan 23
#40
So Mike Johnson is a conspirator covering up a crime, the crime of sexual harassment. Makes him criminal too. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 23
#47
Then why don't they name them? There has to be Democrats on the January 6th committee privy to that.
JohnSJ
Jan 24
#51
Sure, i favor having that sub-committee investigate the investigators and the witnesses.
Jit423
Jan 24
#52
The WaPo article never mentions rape threats: "sexual texts from members who were trying to engage in sexual favors"
Celerity
Jan 24
#57
He also states, without evidence, that the texts were sent after her testimony.
demmiblue
Jan 24
#65
I'm sorry, and yes, what you said is true. However, the OP's headline is still bullshit.
AZJonnie
Jan 27
#80
They didn't want her to testify because she would expose the abuse related to her testimony.
58Sunliner
Jan 27
#82
It is rape, and I don't understand why some DUers aren't getting and are snarking at the OP
obamanut2012
Jan 24
#62