Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My husband and I agree, we are now in a same sex marriage. Raine1967 Saturday #1
Not only definitions but the line between satire and reality, while on shaky ground for some time, has completely Amaryllis Saturday #26
Could this be the reason I turned out Gay? William769 Saturday #2
Well, since we all started out the same Bettie Saturday #23
Yep, I've always thought that pansexual is the pure orientation... Think. Again. Saturday #32
If that is true, why are do so many people have a strong attraction to a particular gender even when it makes life Martin68 Saturday #47
All very good questions... Think. Again. Saturday #51
In truth dweller Saturday #3
I stand corrected! Think. Again. Saturday #4
And what does one do if they have one of the many... 3catwoman3 Saturday #5
Your example was one of the main reasons the "X" designation was added to the passport under the Biden administration BumRushDaShow Saturday #38
Yeah, it's more complicated than that. MineralMan Saturday #6
Yes, I understand trump is wrong (as usual)... Think. Again. Saturday #11
But, it would be incorrect to mark Female, since the genetic genotype is the MineralMan Saturday #17
Does trump's order supercede all other indications... Think. Again. Saturday #19
In my opinion, it does not. Also in many other opinions. MineralMan Saturday #21
Not according to the National Library of Medicine... Think. Again. Saturday #25
I would make a slightly different argument caraher Saturday #33
I'm all for that! Think. Again. Saturday #35
Don't tell Trump the NLM is still online!! TommyT139 Saturday #37
Damn, that's a very good point. Think. Again. Saturday #44
The Executive Order does not mention "genotype", however (or "gene" or "genetic") muriel_volestrangler Saturday #54
The failure to recognize non-binary genotypes RandomNumbers Saturday #40
Yeah, but it's more than that. MineralMan Saturday #42
Thanks for clearing up this misconception Retrograde Saturday #50
The Guardian asked the question as well. Raine1967 Saturday #7
That is not accurate. KentuckyWoman Saturday #8
Fertilized zygotes begin as female ("at conception").. Think. Again. Saturday #9
I guess that's new to me. KentuckyWoman Saturday #10
Here ya go... Think. Again. Saturday #12
So we aren't really talking about the same thing KentuckyWoman Saturday #27
Yes, my concern is that trump's order... Think. Again. Saturday #28
Colbert's take... digsub Saturday #13
That EO is so absurd and non-scientific, it's impossible to enforce. yardwork Saturday #14
Yes, but what legal jeopardy does that put... Think. Again. Saturday #16
Nobody knows, I guess. yardwork Saturday #18
I agree. unfortunately... Think. Again. Saturday #22
And this is known as the "zygomatic process". Right. maggots? GreenWave Saturday #15
Surely you don't expect him to know anything at all about biology MLWR Saturday #20
Nope, I don't .... Think. Again. Saturday #24
Breaking it down to zygotes? czarjak Saturday #29
Yes, trump's order specifies that our sex is determined "at conception", therefore, zygotes. Think. Again. Saturday #30
Just. Wow. czarjak Saturday #31
ive been pondering that for a while now. AllaN01Bear Saturday #34
Maybe he's trying to tell us something? Think. Again. Saturday #36
Yea! rubbersole Saturday #39
When I have to respond to a MAGA moron on this subject... GiqueCee Saturday #41
(Could this be the basis of a legal argument against trump's new rule?) Wiz Imp Saturday #43
There are no laws that state that EOs must be scientifically accurate. LeftInTX Saturday #45
Now we're bordering on actual, certifiable, insanity. Think. Again. Saturday #46
In this case, the science provides a valid legal basis for striking down the executive order. Wiz Imp Saturday #49
I agree with that. They must be constitutional. I don't agree with this EO. Hopefully it will be struck down. LeftInTX Saturday #52
The "poorly educated" win again. nt Jit423 Saturday #48
Yep. Think. Again. Saturday #53
Does that mean every gender specific facility is now mixed? MichMan Saturday #55
I think it means that all American citizens are now classified as female by law. Think. Again. Saturday #56
Until recently, the Texas Democratic Party required a male and female representative for each district in our SDEC LeftInTX Saturday #57
The irony is... Think. Again. Saturday #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Believe it or not, this I...»Reply #36