Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mossfern

(4,627 posts)
33. Morphic Fields
Tue May 13, 2025, 12:54 PM
May 2025
Sheldrake begins his book with a provocative hypothesis: Why are we so sure about the existence of the so-called laws of nature, especially in their current incarnation as immutable and eternal? Given that most scientists share a materialist worldview, belief in something so intangible, eternal, and almost deified seems like a contradiction, or a paradox. At the very least, it leaves an enormous opening for questions about cosmology that most scientists forcefully ignore, beyond a general belief in the Big Bang Theory. As an alternative, Sheldrake suggests that perhaps these laws of nature are simply habits of nature that have developed gradually over long periods of time so as to seem like immutable laws. Perhaps they were not inherent in the cosmic period that preceded the Big Bang but emerged out of that evolutionary process over billions of years. If the universe was born in a primordial explosion fourteen billion years ago, could the “laws of the universe” also have evolved over time? After all, as Sheldrake points out, this idea of natural laws arose from the minds of men obsessed with the laws of man.

Although many people no longer believe in [. . .] God, his changeless laws have survived him to this day. But when we pause to consider the nature of these laws, they rapidly become mysterious. They govern matter and motion, but they are not themselves material nor do they move. They cannot be seen or weighed or touched; they lie beyond the realm of sense experience. They are potentially present everywhere and always. They have no physical source or origin. Indeed, even in the absence of God, they still share many of his traditional attributes. They are omnipresent, immutable, universal, and self-subsistent. Nothing can be hidden from them, nor lie beyond their power. (p. 18)

This idea that the entire universe is a nested, self-organizing system powered by habit rather than “laws” is our entry point into the broader theory of morphic fields, or what Sheldrake calls “formative causation.” This memory that nature appears to exhibit at both the micro and macro levels might be a feature of manifest reality as much as gravitational or electromagnetic fields. And, as we will see, ancient yogis shared this view that reality is a series of nested, self-organizing systems with infinite intelligence embedded at every layer.


https://medium.com/the-wisdom-revolution/a-brief-introduction-to-morphic-fields-88fe09d2661d

There is much more on the website

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Old hippies used to call it cosmic consciousness. FalloutShelter May 2025 #1
I wanna quanna BoRaGard May 2025 #2
Imagine a world with no Trumps C_U_L8R May 2025 #3
Whatever we're in, it sucks. Xavier Breath May 2025 #4
I took both pills orangecrush May 2025 #28
We are stuck in a bardo where everything leftyladyfrommo May 2025 #29
Lately I've been interested in the concept of multigraincracker May 2025 #5
Been re-watching Matrix movies lately? Wounded Bear May 2025 #6
No, but I am familiar with them. kentuck May 2025 #9
Carl Jung, renowned psychologist, believed in the collective unconscious. Irish_Dem May 2025 #7
When we are asleep, we are in a state of unconsciousness.... kentuck May 2025 #10
What might be happening in this process? Irish_Dem May 2025 #11
There is probably some sort of balance... kentuck May 2025 #14
Source, please, for what you said here: highplainsdem May 2025 #18
What? hatrack May 2025 #19
Yup Mossfern May 2025 #23
Wow, that is so neat. Irish_Dem May 2025 #32
Morphic Fields Mossfern May 2025 #33
Many thanks. Irish_Dem May 2025 #34
Yes Mossfern May 2025 #35
Sounds interesting.... anciano May 2025 #8
Yes, I've been looking into it more myself. W_HAMILTON May 2025 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author prodigitalson May 2025 #36
That feeling that someone or somwthing is there prodigitalson May 2025 #38
It's not so much that, but increasing occurrences of "the Mandela effect..." W_HAMILTON May 2025 #40
. . . dweller May 2025 #13
That seems to define what is happening... kentuck May 2025 #15
Yes, I am. No, I'm not. Simultaneously. nt eppur_se_muova May 2025 #16
So the Orange Idiot's consciousness is also mine? tinrobot May 2025 #17
I don't believe it... Chemical Bill May 2025 #20
Vietnamese buddhist, Thich Nhat Hanh on collective consciousness called Manas Beringia May 2025 #21
There is a reality. We cannot alter it as individuals. MineralMan May 2025 #22
Yeah, but Mossfern May 2025 #24
before enlightenment, carrying water, chopping wood WhiteTara May 2025 #26
Exactly Mossfern May 2025 #27
My husband Rebl2 May 2025 #25
It's a helluva thing... orangecrush May 2025 #30
The Buddhists were on to this 2500 years ago. leftyladyfrommo May 2025 #31
Yes, I lean toward some theories concerning this and away from others delisen May 2025 #37
I really like the books on the idea of the universe as a hologram... ananda May 2025 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is anyone here familiar w...»Reply #33