Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WSHazel

(872 posts)
23. I will try, but I recommend Ed Zitron
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 06:29 AM
Yesterday

He is shredding AI on his blog and YouTube.

1) it is not intelligent. Current AI is a really good search engine, but it is not intelligent. It is not thinking. This limits its productive use.

2) it is insanely expensive to run. The amount of compute power needed to run a simple “dialogue” with the AI engine can eat up a monthly subscription in about an hour, depending on the complexity.

3) The entire supply chain is based on absurdly huge demand projections that would make AI 2-3x the current software industry. Why would people buy that much given its technological limitations?

4) Nvidia and others are stuffing their supply chains. They have already shipped more GPU’s then could be installed this year.

5) The data centers (think Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, Oracle) are buying the chips/GPUs, and many data centers have been announced but haven’t been started. A data center’s profitability is based on massive government subsidies, and there has been a bipartisan revolt against them by people. There needs to be a lot more data centers for AI to achieve profitability, and building has slowed down.

6) Circular deals - GPU buying has slowed, so Nvidia and others are paying OpenAI and Anthropic to buy Nvidia chips by buying stock in OpenAI and Anthropic. Amazon and Microsoft are doing similar with their data centers. This is a really bad sign, because it points out that the AI software companies are nowhere close to cash flow positive, but VCs are not willing to fill the breach. The vast majority of investors funding AI are able to treat that investment as revenue, thereby inflating their own stock price.

This is about a third of the problems with AI economics.

If any part of this slows down, the entire ecosystem, which has been carrying the stock market since 2022, starts to have serious problems.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I wish politicians were smarter about bubbles WSHazel Tuesday #1
Really? MadameButterfly Tuesday #3
I will try, but I recommend Ed Zitron WSHazel Yesterday #23
could you include a link, please? rurallib 22 hrs ago #26
Here is one link, there are many more WSHazel 19 hrs ago #28
THanks. This is fascinating MadameButterfly 17 hrs ago #31
Nvidia Betty Boom Tuesday #5
In 1998, a broker gave me similar advice DFW Yesterday #14
I've purchased other stock over the years, but never had one go as crazy as this one did Betty Boom Yesterday #19
It's a spectator sport for me as well DFW Yesterday #20
Capital gains tax in Germany (Kapitalertragsteuer ie KESt) Celerity 16 hrs ago #32
I wouldn't have had the patience to look that up, so tack skall du ha! DFW 8 hrs ago #34
If we had listened to Bernie in the first place we wouldn't be in this mess. Hassin Bin Sober Tuesday #2
I think too many people listening to Sanders in the first place is why we are in this mess to begin with. W_HAMILTON Yesterday #13
If only Harry Reid hadn't been able to talk Sanders out of primarying Obama in 2012. betsuni Yesterday #17
Exactly mvd Yesterday #15
Yep nt Rob H. 22 hrs ago #27
50% isn't enough if they steal my work MadameButterfly Tuesday #4
Adapt. Adjust Betty Boom Tuesday #6
My cannonball factory has been pretty slow for a while now.....BUT AZ8theist Yesterday #10
Replacing old inventions with new inventions MadameButterfly 18 hrs ago #30
There is no such thing as original anything Betty Boom 9 hrs ago #33
If that was true, we'd all still be scratching our asses staring at a blank cave wall. meadowlander 8 hrs ago #35
We could have an interesting conversation about Picasso.... CTyankee 37 min ago #37
Once AGI is better than humans at all labor that generates value in a capitalist society, there is no job to adjust to. meadowlander 8 hrs ago #36
50% of a negative number is a negative number WSHazel 19 hrs ago #29
Andrew Yang was ahead of his time. Emile Tuesday #7
Boy was he ever! calimary Tuesday #8
OMG....WANG/Sanders!!!!!! Seriously....2028!!!!! a kennedy Yesterday #12
Wang/Sanders 2028. a kennedy Yesterday #16
Financing shouldn't be hard to obtain for an Independent run DFW Yesterday #21
Sorry, but remember he's not a Democrat gulliver Yesterday #9
I do not have any good answers to any of this. I used to tell people if you state of stupid Yesterday #11
You don't think robots can fix robots? Emile Yesterday #22
Yes, there is no doubt that can be done. I also wonder at what point we have to state of stupid 23 hrs ago #25
We shoudl set up a basic income Matthew28 Yesterday #18
This has been coming since the 1980s. Blue Full Moon Yesterday #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders is on CNN ...»Reply #23