Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Murkowski announces she will vote against Hegseth [View all]MLAA
(18,850 posts)18. She is a no until she isn't! I'll believe it when I see it. But, yes, she is extremely concerned!
My first thought was it was prearranged that she and Murkowski can vote no and every other Republican will vote yes.
Edit to correct typo.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does their new-ish ranked choice system change the equation? Do they still have it?
Hassin Bin Sober
Jan 23
#29
Let's see how big her cojones are after the parade of republicans talk to her, after listening to their
Escurumbele
Jan 24
#53
She is a no until she isn't! I'll believe it when I see it. But, yes, she is extremely concerned!
MLAA
Jan 23
#18
...perfect fit. More than once I've wanted to tell her to shove a sock in it when she starts saying she has 'concerns'
MLAA
Jan 23
#34
I hope I'm wrong in that they probably have the votes needed which allows one or more to vote against him.
chowder66
Jan 23
#16
51 to 49 to advance to the final vote - Murkowski and Collins voted to block
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 23
#22