Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

NNadir

(37,987 posts)

15. From the data at the link in post #14, one can calculate that the capacity utilization of nuclear plants in China

Reply to OKIsItJustMe (Reply #13)

Thu Mar 26, 2026, 01:42 PM

7 hrs ago

From the data at the link in that post, one can calculate that the capacity utilization of nuclear plants in China is 79%, a figure lower than that of the United States, but probably attributable to the fact that the new reactors coming on line last year did not operate for a full year.

The reactors in question are Fangchenggang 4, connected to the grid in April of 2024, Shidaowan Guohe One 1, connected to the grid in October of 2024, and Zhangzhou 1, connected to the grid in November of 2024.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Extreme global climate outcomes are possible even at 2C of warming [View all] OKIsItJustMe 16 hrs ago OP

James Hansen et al: Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and... OKIsItJustMe 15 hrs ago #1

Yes, but Fukushima was worse, right? NNadir 13 hrs ago #2

False Dichotomy OKIsItJustMe 11 hrs ago #3

Bullshit. There is a CAUSE of the climate collapse, and it is the use of fossil fuels. NNadir 11 hrs ago #4

Yes OKIsItJustMe 11 hrs ago #5

Bullshit again. Nuclear energy is the ONLY form of power, worldwide, that exceeds the capacity utilization of coal... NNadir 11 hrs ago #6

As usual, you suggest that anyone who disagrees with you in the slightest degree is ignorant and/or stupid OKIsItJustMe 10 hrs ago #7

As usual I note that while I respect and utilize the IEA tables giving historical data, I have zero respect for... NNadir 9 hrs ago #9

Something you won't bother to read OKIsItJustMe 9 hrs ago #8

I read all day long, but I am very clear that the word "Watt" is a unit of PEAK power, not energy. If one... NNadir 9 hrs ago #10

The sort of evidence you ignore because it doesn't support your narrative OKIsItJustMe 9 hrs ago #11

I refer you to post #9 in this thread. As for climate gas reductions in China, attributing them to solar... NNadir 8 hrs ago #12

A scientist looks at evidence for and against their theories OKIsItJustMe 8 hrs ago #13

Again, bullshit: Pot and Kettle. I have merely pointed out that climate gas reductions in China can be attributed... NNadir 7 hrs ago #14

From the data at the link in post #14, one can calculate that the capacity utilization of nuclear plants in China NNadir 7 hrs ago #15

China is adding renewable capacity MUCH faster than it is adding Nuclear. thought crime 2 hrs ago #16

The "nukes-only" folk don't understand the word "transition". thought crime 2 hrs ago #17