Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Indydem

(2,642 posts)
3. Considering one does not have to be a terrorist,
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 07:55 AM
Nov 2015

Have terrorist intentions, or even be a criminal to make it on the completely arbitrary "terrorist watch list," I have no idea how anyone would, in good concience, advocate denying people in said arbitrary list, their constitutional rights.

Unless of course you are ok with governors declaring people "risky voters" and denying them the right to vote in their next election based solely on their personal, unevidenced beliefs.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»‘NRA’s Sick Jihad': N.Y. ...»Reply #3